Okashi Towers

⠀

fazzoletti ovunque, un casino

‎

[quote][b]Note: Dead PvP game[/b] This game contains no meaningful single player content. There's no viably populated servers/active player population. This game cannot be played as intended.[/quote] This was a hybrid RTS/TD game with phoned in pixelcrap graphics and marketing material that looks like a bunch of AI slop So, "Okashi Towers" is a dead PvP game. Why did it fail? It's video game autopsy time! [i]Almost every PvP exclusive game on Steam fails.[/i] Only a tiny proportion of them "go viral". This game failed for many of the same reasons those others fail. The chief of which is the developer thinking that their game will "go viral" without actually creating any reason for it do so. Competition amongst PvP centric games is extreme, and there's only a finite player base to appeal to. This game failed to reach any kind of critical mass and died as a result. Let's go into some of the reasons this particular game failed to appeal to gamers, despite the zero up front cost. First and foremost, there's no meaningful single player content. The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design etc to the Game.…

Played once, became a pro. Undefeated. Good Game -Skipped Tutorial, went straight to pvp.

Okashi Towers takes the familiar structure of tower defense and gives it a more active real-time strategy flavor, creating an experience where protecting your territory is only one part of the battle. Developed and published by Blekoh, the game uses a cheerful candy-inspired world to present warfare in a much lighter and more playful manner. Beneath the colorful pixel graphics, however, is a strategy game built around resource management, defensive construction, scouting, and eventually taking the fight directly to the opposition. Candy functions as the foundation of the economy. Players need to decide how their available resources should be divided between improving their position and preparing an offensive force. Towers can be constructed and upgraded to make a base increasingly difficult to penetrate, while economic development helps generate the resources required for future expansion. The interesting part is that building an impressive defensive network does not automatically lead to victory. Remaining passive for too long can allow an opponent to strengthen its own economy and military, so successful play requires knowing when to stop investing in protection and start applyi…