Battlefield Commander WWII

can't run the game runs bad, and no not even in big combats, i didn't even finish the tutorial as the game ran around 30 to 40 fps constantly in 4km, i can run crimson desert without any problems on my setuip but not the tutorial in this game ? needs more time on making the game run better, might test the game again when its done....

Lots of fun for a low price. There is still a way's to go and you can see much will be added (no anti tank guns for now, by example) but the gameplay is really fun. I pulled an all nighter finishing a campaign, which I never do unless I'm pretty hooked.

Battlefield Commander: World War II has a surprisingly strong foundation, blending elements reminiscent of Hearts of Iron IV and more casual mobile WWII strategy titles, but with a real-time tactics layer that gives it real potential. At its core, the game feels like it could evolve into something genuinely compelling—but right now, it’s held back by several major gameplay issues. The biggest problem lies in the combat system. Unit interactions often feel unbalanced or unfinished. Tanks, for example, struggle to effectively deal with infantry—even when those infantry are caught in the open—largely due to underwhelming machine gun performance. On the flip side, mortars are extremely powerful to the point of dominating matches. Because of the shared spotting system, a single recon unit can expose enemies, allowing backline mortars to completely wipe them out with little counterplay. This creates a meta where players can exploit spotting mechanics and rely heavily on indirect fire, which feels unfair and reduces tactical variety. Spotting itself is another major issue. Enemy detection mechanics make offensive play frustrating, often forcing players into a defensive posture even when…

game doesnt save

terrible... what is this??

Nice little symmetrical tactical game. Victory is rewarding. Kills have to be earned. Could be more detailed but it's good as is. 1v1 multiplayer?