SandTable War: Three Kingdoms

A little bit too micro intensive for my comfort. It feels less like a game and more like a deskjob. A lot of these micro-tasks need better management features. - Have to zoom-out to see border color. - Have to manually transport foods from town to town. - Have to manually click each town to check its available reservists. - Have to manually click each town to modify tax policies. - Have to manually go to diplomatic menu to check whether alliances need renewal every few minutes. - You can ignore most of the features in game and focus on big troop number then play it like Mushroom Wars. - You can also renew alliance indefinitely. You have total control when to fight the AI. - I thought the game could at least let me create custom general, but nope. For whatever reason, this game reminds me of Plebby Quest. It's game that could be something, but end up nothing. Maybe it might receive future updates? lol

ROTK Clone without the QOL. Spent more than a few hours got the scenario down to 3 kingdoms. Every step of the way was like pulling teeth. For some reason the dev's decided it was a good idea to impede every thing you want to try to do. Every process is cumbersome and Inundated by limiters that do nothing other than limit your ability to play. Your Kingdom has a Tech tree which you put points into the specific node to increase your Kingdom modifiers. You have 4 Ministers that help you expedite the Accrual of these points. If you do anything else with these 4 ministers they automatically get removed from your cabinet. So these 4 officers are now basically bunkered down in BFE while they run your kingdom. - 4 Officers. Each town/city requires a Prefect, Military Officer, and Building Officer. These are unique positions so if you have even just 4 towns to fully maximize everything especially early on you would need 12 officers. - Just get more officers.. DUH. Except doing most of your schemes require a "tactical" resource point. (the accrual is expedited by installing an officer in your cabinet) except its not enough. EVERYTHING from sowing discord {lowering officer loyalty}, …

我的妈呀，貂蝉是男的吗？不看名字会以为她战斗力强过吕布。 不好意思，这画风我很难接受。 整个地图”清一色“沙“的颜色（是有一点树和水的颜色），不过看久还是受不了（我也就看了10分钟和10分钟）。 我知道名字是 ”Sand Table“ 但也以更鲜艳吧。 谈一谈游戏： 战斗没有战斗画面，战斗就在大地图看人头和数字，没什么战略。 就看谁人多，还有武力？ 玩习惯“Koei” 或玩过 “Three Kingdoms The Last Warlord” 和 “Total War 3K” 的应该不会喜欢这款。 但有玩过 "Hearts of Iron", "Crusader kings" 可能可以试试看，就这样了。

This is easily the best grand strategy game I have ever played. The amount of forethought and planning required to effectively wage wars is incredible, and yet so easy compared to other, more complex games. The complexity is just right, with plenty to manage and track and yet not so much that it's unfathomable. And the feeling of pulling off incredible tactics that result from the interaction of simple mechanics is the height of emergent story-telling. The best way to play is Ironman mode, where every decision matters and blunders have to be accounted for and overcome. I love this game, and if you're a fan of Three Kingdoms strategy games, this one is absolutely worth a try. Just be sure to do the tutorial and read the tooltips on stats and stuff. The game is not perfect, for the record, but it is close. The Diplomacy system is very simplistic, but it seems to have been improved to be less exploitable. The end-game can be a bit slow, but it has been drastically improved as a result of the recent changes to introduce global food/reserves to permit a rolling sweep of the map, in addition to the Annex option for lesser factions, greatly improving the final conquests. I wholehearte…

good war game with simplified mechanic and depth compare to ROTK. It's fun and has some depth , not too complicated.

Its a very streamlined rotk experence, if you like the time per this is not a bad title.